On this page
-
Text (2)
-
444 The Leader and Saturday Analyst. P^a...
-
THE PARLIAMENT AND THE PRESS. TH E publi...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Schism In Council.—India. Sir Charles Tr...
that it is overrated to the extent of more than one half , and will not exceed £ 3 , 000 , 000 .- If that be an approximation to the truth , a large portion of Mr . Wilson Vnew taxes will positively mot be wanted . Then a very important consideration arises , to which we earnestly hope the public and the Parliament will pay attention , and not allow , as Sir C . Wood recommends , the Indian Government to arrange the taxation of India without interference . Governments , we know , are only encouraged m wasteful extravagance by an abundant revenue . Those who are acquainted with our financial history will recollect how the money of the
people of England was squandered , for example , m 1823 , 4 , 5 , when the Government had a " Godsend , " and an unusual supply of money . It has always been squandered whenever it could be easily obtained . On such a subject no witness can be superior to Sir C . Trevelyan , and he tells us that " official hierarchies never look with favour on reduction of expenditure . « At Calcutta , " as at London , " the favourite remedy has always been increase of taxation , " which the late Sir R . Peel once described as the vulgar expedient , had recourse to on all occatheir hand into the
sions by feeble Governments , " of putting national pocket . " " Large funds , " says Sir Charles , " suddenly placed at the disposal of a public department are certain to Weaken the restraints of economy . " " Funds procured by . such taxes as are proposed would be wastefuUy raised and wastefully applied" Correctly , we have no doubt , he observes , " tliat the proposed increase of taxation would arrest the course of improvement in the South of India , and prevent the reduction ot the redundancy of ill-paid revenue officers , which is its greatest evil . It would lead to its increase , for the European officers are
already overtasked . In accordance with these just remarks , Sir Charles zealously and eloquently advocates , as opposed to increased taxation , the reduction of establishments and of expenditures This is the only safe means of dealing with this great subject . " We cannot afford , " he says , " to have a discontented people and a discontented army on our hands at the same time . " He therefore ¦ would , if possible , increase the content of the people , now most favourably disposed towards our rule , who have continued quiet in the midst of mutiny ; and decrease the army , which would give additional hands to industry , and thus increase the national prosperity and the national revenue .
Our limits forbid us to follow Sir Chahles in all his detailed recommendations for melting down all the heterogeneous elements" of the old military establishment into a good police and a good auxiliary native force ; " to concentrate our military power - at-fl-few- ^^^^^ - p" ^^""^ .-from , which , with our-present facility of transport , every part of the huge empire might be speedily reached and commanded ; to make the civil service more efficient , and to pay . its members better , the present general rise of prices making salaries and wages insufficient for subsistence , and therefore making additional taxation unusually objectionable . We content ourselves with saying , on his authority , " that
large reductions are making , both in Madras and Bombay , and large corresponding improvements , but that the great field for reduction is Northern India . " He remarks , correctly ,. that there are now no large native armies in . existence , as in Lord Amherst ' s and Lord William Bentinok ' s time , and no necessity , consequently , for us to keep up corresponding armies . The Bengal native army has dissolved itself ; there is , throughout our territory , prosperity and unusual employment for the people . The opportunity , therefore , is excellent for making reductions .
" The national balance-sheet may be adjusted by reducing expenditure , or by increasing taxation ; " but the Government has no right , Sir Charles justly asserts , to demand additional taxation , unless it be impossible " to reduce expenditure . " His enlightened sentiments and his vigorous denunciation of Mr . Wilson ' s new * tremendous taxes , " are fully subscribed to by Sir Peter Okant , the Hon . W , A . Morehead , and the Hon . B . Maltby , the members of the Madras Council ; and there already prevails , we are told on authority , a " sullen feeling of dissatisfaction wherever Mr . Wilson ' s scheme of taxation has been
understood . " We are well assured that the contest between the two official gentlemen on such vital questions will not end in mere words . One or other will have to secede from the Government The public , therefore , must lie prepared to take a sid , e , and resolve whether it will stand by Sir Charles Trevelyan , a reduced revenue , and economy } or by Mr . Wilson , new taxes , an enlarged revenue , arid corresponding waste , ending in renewed mutinies nnd ruin . There are indications in the Minute of a strong personal feeling between these two official gentlemen , and it is impossible that both oan remain in high positions in India with advantage to the public service .
444 The Leader And Saturday Analyst. P^A...
444 The Leader and Saturday Analyst . P ^ ay ™> ] 86 ° -
The Parliament And The Press. Th E Publi...
THE PARLIAMENT AND THE PRESS . TH E public are at last indebted to Mr . Hobsman for an amusing * and instructive episode , that has relieved the weary sameness of parliamentary debates . For a long time Mr . Hobsman has been insTstate of chronic irritability , and if we did not know that the honourable member for Stroud was an old stager in public affairs , we should imagine him to be cutting his political teeth , and exhibiting' tbat'fractiousness which is too well-known in the nursery , and drives suffering parents to " Mrs . Johnson ' s soothing syrup , or some other " real blessing to mothers , " Mr . Hobsman is certainly entitled to the praise of disinterestedness . He disgusts his
constituents , and flings away his reputation with a spendthrift magnanimity that gives the lie to any accusation of corrupt motives . If any one accused him of self-seeking , he could point triumphantly to his constant practice of self-slaughter , and those who wish him well regret that ho does not manifest the ordinary circumspection of a man who is able to perceive the consequences of his acts . We do not wish to be hard upon Mr . Hobsman , and much prefer the realitv of his querulousness to the sham and pretence of most parliamentary speakers ; and we believe that , without clearly knowing what he was about , he has done more good than nine-tenths of the tiresome gentlemen who have lowered the character of the House of Commons by their six weeks' chatter against Parliamentary
Reform . Mr . Hobsman was dragged before the assembled wisdom of the nation on Monday as the proprietor of a singular grievance . The Times newspaper had accused our immaculate senators of being influenced by the fear of dissolution and the expense of contested elections , and the chief proprietor of that journal had made a speech on the inconvenience of sending members of Parliament to meet their constituents on the co-tly occasion of an appeal for their votes . In the remarks of the Times Mr . Hobsman's name figured with an ironical allusion that might , with a little squeezing , be interpreted to include him in the category of imperfect patriots , and which induced him to write to Mr . Walteb , complaining of the course his paper had taken , and expressing his intention to notice the matter in the House of Commons . A few letters were exchanged , and the end of it was that Sir . Walter brought the"case forward himself ,
and emphatically denied any personal responsibility for the opinions expressed by the journal of which he war a ' proprietor . Mr . Hobsman , in reply , complained of the irresponsibility of the Press , and was virtuously indignant about what he called the calumnious attack of the Times upon the House ofCommons . In the course of his speech he read a letter he had addressed to Mr . Wai / tee , and which that gentleman was too modest to read himself . Jn-this epistle he expressed his belief that Mr . Walteb was responsible for the conduct of his paper , and spoke of the calamity of a great ; journal being " true to no principle , constant to no policy , and disdainful of all rules of public justice and morality . " These and similar sentences were loudly cheered as they were read , and a sensation was produced by the following public allusion to circumstances
well known but rarely referred to : — " I have not time to remark on the personal influences by which the Times is supposed to beaffected . the peculiar influences that draw Mr . Delane to Lord Palmebston , Wd ~ tfre-aiia : malotts ^ o 8 itw ^ Treasury Bench . " Mr . Hobsman seems altogether to mistake the source of the power a newspaper wields . Its editor may dine with Lord Pat-mebston , and one of its Writers may sit on the Treasury Bench , but it can exert little influence if it is not , on the whole , an accurate representation of the thoughts and wishes of its readers or constituents . If the Times did not obtain support from
that portion-of the public to which it is addressed , its plans would soon be altered , or its circulation and influence would fall . . Not one reader in a thousand cares for its columns of advertisements , and , thanks to competition , all the facts of the day can be obtained elsewhere . It is idle to talk of irresponsibility—the Times Is responsible to its supporters ; and those who habitually buy it or read it would not do so if they felt any horror at its career . The average tone of the morals of the wealthy class does not lead them to brand the conducfr-of a journal that chops and changes with" the varying interests ' . and passions of their order , nor does a connexion of responsibility with such an organ cause any one to be shunned in will when
the " best society . " The time , no doubt , come playing fast and loose with great public questions will be deemed a crime ; but bo long as members of Parliament buy their seats , and refuse , session after session , to legislate honestly against political corruption , it is-ridiculous for them to complain that somebody besides themselves trades in political principles , and keeps on hand a stock that their business experience leads them to anticipate will sell . The ionrnalism of England is a lo v rig way from perfection , but it is in advance of the public , who will scarcely ever supply anything better than insolvency and ruin for any fearless and consistent advocate of truth . There is not on record an instance of a-high-priced paper that has obtained a large circulation on account of the integrity
and ' ability of its editorial department , and fewthings are more unsaleable than steady devotion to sound principles and just plans . The anonymous charnotor of leading articles may , perhaps , be modified , but it could not bo advantageously abandoned . Hundreds of the most laborious students and ablest thinkers are not known to the publio , and the systematic appending of their names to their contributions would excite personal antagonisms that now happily do nofc exist . In provincial towns the editor of a paper is always known , nnd many London journals oxerfc a power from tho charaoter of particular persons who edit or contribute to them . In the case of the Times everybody has known that Mr . Delanos was its editor , and Mr . Lows one of its chief ooribei . Thus , then , has existed the
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), May 12, 1860, page 8, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_12051860/page/8/
-