On this page
-
Text (2)
-
sm THE LEA BE R. [Saturday,
-
A RUSSIAN PAMPHIlET:* IV. (Conclusion.) ...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Sm The Lea Be R. [Saturday,
sm THE LEA BE R . [ Saturday ,
A Russian Pamphilet:* Iv. (Conclusion.) ...
A RUSSIAN PAMPHIlET : * IV . ( Conclusion . ) £ We repeat the caution that throughout these Articles it is the " Inhabitant of Continental Europe" who speaks . We do bat report . ] Howjbvjsr aaelancholy may be the prospects of the war for Europe , it may tie that the moral and political regeneration of the East will be the providential Tes-uit of the crisis we deplore , and which Russia is accused of having provoked . Russia -may claim tlie double glory of having served as the instrument of the divine decrees , and of having understood the Eastern question better than the statesmen of the West . What the Emperor of Russia tr & ated as : an . eventuality in 1852 , when he invited England , to come to
4 m understanding to prevent t » e disasters which the decline of tbe Ottoman Empire involved , is an accomplished fact in 1854 . Though the principle of ¦ the ' integrity and independence' of Turkey is still in T / igour , we can scarcely believe in the political vitality ; of an empire whose capital is surrendered to . & formidable fleet—whose provinces . are held by an army of occupation- — whose populations are abandoned to revolt ~ whose central government is under the avowed protection of an ambassador , and whose local authorities . are . under the surveillance of consular agents who impose laws wJiich are incornpatible with . tJxe supreme-law of the preservation and even tlie existence of theiempire . What did Prince Metternieh . say in the Austrian note of April 20 , 1841 , ^ hlchmay ; Vefound'ini ; he [ Blue ^ The Forte had spontaneously claimed the . good offices of Austria to obtain the guarantee of her existence by reci-^^ ¦ r ^^ m ^ j ^^ " ^^ ^ ^ . " — 7 ^^^ ^^ ^ ' - —^^ — ¦ . ^^ ^ ¦ ^* . ¦ : " 9 *^ > ™»^^ r » ¦ , ¦ ¦ —wi ^* . ^^ *^ 4 >; ' ^ r ^^& - ^^ j ^ Tr r v ^^ 4 * . ^>^^ f ** : T » ^^ wA — .
procal engagements between the great Bowers of Europe . , PH » ce Metteroidli'Twsrote , .. •« * < -A . State wHich plaxjes jitself under the guarantee of another ^ State , loses' ; the ftbwer rof its ; independence : submifjs itself to tjae wiU of i ^ e protestor ; fox * the guarantee , to be ;; efficacious , anust . include the right <> f ^ prateetoirate , and . If a single . protector is an incunAraiice , a collective piotectdnttte is / an intolerableV burden . " Events Jiave mar , clied rapidly since the date of that jiote ^ fo ^ independence , '' ah expression , never applied to a State ; -really independent , inspires the Turfcs ( those new adepts in the : public law of Europe ) with confidence-enough-tobrave the power of ^ Russia . - ¦ ¦ Itwas ^ he ^ pectacJepf this ^ slow ; wasting-. agony . of . a . ^ oyernni en"t at ; once ; un-|) tX 3 nciple 4 and Tash enough . to brave ; Eranceland JRussia ; in succession , that andux ^^ he Emperor
^ thatibhr 6 atehed the ^ ast , to <> f correspondence , 3 nte ^ 3 icity ; a 8 ifthey-exposed ambitious designs of Russia . Any one who' reads ^ r ith ^ sufficient attention the reports addiessed -by the English Minister after •^ ariotis . conversations he bad with = the Emperor , or \ yith the . ^ Russian 'Chancellor , will recognise on "the one side a m ^ acn ^ liheiran isness . of conduct in that last eHbrJ ; of . a . man , who , having convictions arid the courage to avow theno , spurns rtlipse / reticences and circumlocutions which idre . the resort of diploanacy ; and > -wlaose very language inspires ( confidence by ats xuiaccustpnied fanauaarLtyv On the other Side will be Observed a diplomatist who makes a principle of ! xUstriast , Teplyinrg by generalities and commonplaces , and employing Swords only to disguise his thoughts .
JLnithe'depths of the ' secret and confidential' ( the tiJJe bestowed uppii these Eng lish reppcts ) may . be -detected a predetermined treacliery which the published documents bring to light . In these the English Minister transcribes'the words of the Emperor , and interprets their meaning by has -own personal suggestions , not forgetting , as a man of shrewdness and experience , to leave himself a door of escape by "remarking wore than , once with graceful candour , that lie thinks he has forgotten the precise terms of the conversation . We 'may suppose that the opposition to any extension of the 'territory of the Hellenic kingdom , of which we- find no trace in the documents emanating from the Russian . Chancery , and . which , is neither consonant with the feelings of 'the > Emperor Nicholas nor wit ! Russian interests , is an instance of having forgotten the precise steums , ' if it be not an
adroit invention o > f Sir : G . II . . Seymour , destined to produce its effect in due season . We fawwv that bosides" > the official despatches , ^ writte to appear , 8 Qoner -or later in the Blue Boobs , ilie i Englisji 'diplomatic agents make freguent use of private correspo ndence , which often leaves no trace in the Foreign-dmce . Perhaps it is there that the solution of -this ingenious problem .-may be sought . No doubt it became England , whose policy it is to ^ prolong ftlie flatus quo of the East , and to isolate Russia , to avow her belief in tlie vitality of Turkey , and to accuse iRaissia of seeking to precipitate the tfatal denotiment . The iBuxopean jn : css interprets the Emperor ' s words by 1 lho light . of , the amfoassado ^' s ' contidentiaV transcript , and even ascribes to . Russia the design of taking jpasaession , of ,. the Principalities and of Bulgaria . To give an / air of arojility itp . a phantom , it was necosuary to inwonfc a material interest . for RuBsia n ^ here'she had only a moral and religious interest , tlie restoration of Hhe J 2 < t $ tto 'CthruitianUy , and the suppression of a political anomaly and a permanent menac i to tie peace of the ivorld , What noither Sir Q , M . Seymour ' s veraion-of the Emperor ' s words , nor the bolder and less skilful
interpretations of iihe press have yet been nbleto distort , is the clctw and ftwrniil declaration of the OSmpcwx ' Nichola 3 . I . That he did oiot moan to seize Constantinople , nor desire any territorial extension , any conquest . I'd / That Jho had not accepted thtj inheritance of p'ojects formed by liis ancestresB , * he Envppess Catlierino II This declaration -from Due mouth of a Sovereign wliom not even Us enemies ocm accuse : qf 7 iavi ? ig'broken . Ms word during tivenlyeiyltt years of his reign , is of immense sigp ? ficancc ,, ran . a suffices alone to -reduce to their proper worth nil those calumnious suspicions wluoh -have been iabriciitod out of the despatches of Sir G . Hamilton Seymour . The commentators on tlieso despatches luivo abstained from noting a noble aa » d / gewirous / thought , which soaped the diplomatist at the end of liis 4 capatoli . of January 22 , 185 J 3 . It . is thia : " It would be a noble triumph for jtho civilisation of the nineteenth century to succeed in filling up the vdia-wkieh theoxtonsion Qf . ieho Mahornefcan rdligion haa mude -in Europe , * La Guor «> d'Oriout . ' OesOwiaos dt' » ea ' Oona < Jquvnce » , 13 ar UnMibitaiftHo . l'JSmonB Cont % n < aUntc . Brusollea , 1854 . e
and to do this by measures of precaution adopted by the two governments which are chiefly interested in the destinies of Turkey . " These are noble words , and they do honour to Sir G . H . Seymour . The diplomatist we perceive , involuntarily feels the influence of the noble frankness of the Sovereign who honoured him with his confidence . That despatch was written fresh from the Emperor ' s lips , and the minister forgot for a moment Talleyrand's precept , never to obey first impulses too often good . After riper reflection , he returns in the following despatch to his phlegmatic denial of any cause for apprehension in the East : at the very moment when tbe
Montenegrine insurrection produced a crisis : when the French ambassador had coolly declared to the Porte , that the French fleet was ready to proceed to the Coast of Syria to settle the Holy Places dispute , after making a demonstration at Tripoli , which encountered tbe protests of the consuls of England and the United States . This avowal of the English diplomatist has since become a formal and eloquent condemnation of that government , one of the two most deeply interested in the destinies of Turkey , whose loyal and frank co-ppera * tion in . the policy suggested by the other government would have ensured that glorious triunip / i to the civilisation of the nineteenth century , and whose systematic malevolence towards its rival has abandoned that civilisation to
the hazards of \ yai \ Facts . are , after . all , the surest interpretation / of words . If Russia had dreamt of the conquest of the East for herself instead of the Christian restoration of ' the East for the sake ojheriiationalities > Prince Menschikoff would have been escorted by a fleet with 15 , 000 troops : and instead of sending some time after SOjQOO men to occupy the Principalities , as a warning to Turkey and to Europe , a force of froiri 30 , 000 to 40 , 000 men would have crossed tlie Danube in one month ; would have deposed all the Turkish authorities in ; Rpiimelia i swept away the feeble garrisons that held the fortresses ; and , without ericountering any resistance , ; would have taken Constantinople . At that time there was scarcely a force of 12 : 000 men scattered over the whole
surface of Europeans Turkey , excepting the weak garrison Of the capital : the Mussulman populations ^ vere not fanaticised , and would have received the Russians with alacrity ; As soon as the Russian ambassador reached Constantinople , Europe expected resolute and energetic acts on the part Pf Russia . ; and such , would have been the surest and nipst rapid solution of the crisis which only / assumed . mote ser ious proportions wlien Russia hesitated and temporised . Even the u ^ suggested to Russia the designs she had . ijo / , and the mearis of reaUsiiig them . More than one plan Pf campaign Svas fuTnislied to ilussia : by the "journals . If we are accused of exaggerating the opportunities of Russia for a campaign in Roumelia , or iix Asia , in the spring of last year , yve have only to refer tp
the assertions of the English Government itself : notably to tin declaration oj Lord Aberdeen . We say , then , that facts prove the purely peaceable intentions of Russia in the East—as the first condition of a pacific settlenie-ht , she insisted on the emahpipation pf the Christians . This measure would have gradually but ¦ •¦ infallibly- produced , without shock or violence , the suppression of the Turkish regime which survives the existence of the Ottoman Empire , considered as an independent polity . ' To : this Christian restoration of the -East the Western Powers have preferred the resurrection of the Mussulman body politic ; of a Power whose decease is clearly enouigh manifested by the efforts of those who take credit for \& miracle when they produce some galvanic convulsions in a corpse . They prescribe an heroic remedy for the Ottoman Empire by depriving the Sultan of the principal attribute of sovereignty , the prerpgative pf making peace , by condemning his people to fight for a dead cause , and to falsify their ancient faith and institutions at the bidding of a civilisation which , to them -is . dissolution . That civilisation has developed new energies of life in a neighbouri ng state . _ But that state was Christian , and God committed the desbinies of civilisation to Peter I . and not to the Sultan .
Lord Palmerston said in Parhameni last , year that no nation had made more progress in the last thirty years than Turkey . Christendom Las little cause to'feel flattered l > y this compliment . It would have been mox * e exact to say that no nation 3 xas more self-denyingly sacrificed herself to Manchester . Take one instance . Thirty years since Damascus and Aleppo possessed more ithan . thirty . thousand looms of excellent silk and cotton stuff ' s . Now there are , perhaps , from a tbousand to twelve hundred in those two cities .
A former member of finance , Salveti-Eaoha , who was governor of Damascus in J 846 , struck with the destitution of a city once the most floiu'ishing inthe Ttimpire , calculated that Damascus alone had lost about 120 , 000 fmncs of net labour profit per day . Everyone knows the present state of Turkish finance though the taxes ha ^ e been tripled dur ing the present reign . 'The moral progress Pf Turkey is represented by that pvostration of au < thoritv find that consciousness of impotence which aTQ the sure signs of decay . Mussulman'fanaticism is saitlto be extinct because it buries under the ashes
of its gvandeur its hatred of Christiana . Is Lord Stratford , albeit omnipotent in the councils of the Porto , sure that his Turkish porter , a well-paid menial rises when his Lordship passes by , and £ oes that porter , when ho ftddreasos tho anribosaaddr , craploy oven the most modest of epithets in the ordinary parlance of true believers ? The social condition Pf the East may ho violently changed ; tho Ottoman Emniro is founded on the essentially exclusive principle of a religious dogma . Even . ihe Christian communities in the East feel tho cfKjcts of this exclusive principle and show it in their religious hatred . How shall the Turks , whose political and social code , nay , whose country is the Koran , accept tho principle of equality and of political union with tho rai ' as ? In > vl » it sense can the idea of iious law
' progress' bo appliod to a people whoso relg proscribes : I . iPolygamy ; JX , Slavery ; III . Conversion by fbxco to tho law of Mohoomdt ;; IV . Contempt for 'infidels , ' , consequently , tho inequality of civil and political rights ; V . The annual ransom of his life by every subject who professes tibe law ot Islam ; VI . Death to every apostate from Islam , and to every man convicted of having spoken ill of tho ' Prophet ; ' VII . Tho necess ity of Joining tho infants of Roynl blood for fear of conupromiaing tho succession . IThia laat law is obsorved more strictly than tine law agitmsL wino . Sultan Mulintoud , wlio even died of delirium tuemcns-, endeavoured , from ' -his excessive affection for hia daiighter , married -toHtflib Puohsv , to make an exooption to tho laiy-whrch condemns the princes and princesses to dio within forty days after birth . The young Sultana was . indeed , allowed
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Sept. 9, 1854, page 18, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_09091854/page/18/
-