On this page
- Departments (1)
-
Text (7)
-
March 8, 1856.] THE L E A Pffi B. 231
-
== ($)fflU COtWttL T *
-
[iy IKIS DSPAKIHSST, AS AM, OPINIOK-S HO...
-
There i3 no learned man but will confess...
-
AN" HISTORICAL STUDY. (To the Editor of ...
-
AMENDED STATUTES. (To the Editor of the ...
-
Another Emperor.—The world counts one Em...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Oxford Manich/3eism. Oxford Will Not Tol...
tion > — ' When my testimony diverges from what seems to you righteous , which will you follow , me or your moral sense ? ' And in Abraham ' s case the command was only a trial , to pro"be the depths of the Patriarch ' s heart , never designed to be executed . The origin of the Atonement is to be sought in the
righteous wrath of God against sin ; for sin strikes a blow at the authority of God , and so at the order of the universe . The more perfect the character , the more doth it abhor anything that is evil . Holiness Avould banish sinners for ever from his presence , by an antipathy deeply seated in his nature . A representative of the whole human race is
constituted , upon whom went forth the whole curse of God . It was not a sweet savour offering fox acceptance , but as a burnt offering for expiation , and the wrath and curse of God visited the sin bearer with a death specifically different from every other death the world has ever witnessed , —more insupportable ; for when the light of God ' s countenance was withdrawn from Him , all was withdrawn ? Non nosier hie ' sermo *
We need scarcely notice the shallow presumptions which crowd our abridged citations . Dr . Goulbuen forgets that the instincts which lie contemns are given to us by the Divine Author , whose purpose in the creation Dr . Goulburn undertakes to explain , as if lie had been there at the time . He fo 3 ; gets that the child has positive knowledge of his father ' s consistency ; and that where his knowledge fails , his instincts teach him loving trust and obedience . Wlio told him that it is part of
God ' s dealings to try us \> y our moral sense ; who that we must believe and not see , when the millions of things that we see go on , and we ourselves , gor on , whether we believe or not ? Who taught him that it is necessary for the All-seeing to try the faith which is in the heart ? Who taught him that antipathy , is a Divine attribute or that " abhorrence "—the rising of the hairs upon a skin contracted by cold or fear , —is possible to a Divine nature ? Who that
sin or anything else can . strike a blow at the authority of God , or disturb the order of the universe 5 which , so far as we can . see , can understand , believe , or conceive , is never for one instant stricken , arrested , or disturbed ? Dr . Goulburn revels in paradox , works himself up into a dogmatic frenzy , and borrowing the theory of Jewish sacrifice , undertakes to explain the doctrines of the new dispensation in a fierce and sanguinary jargon , as wild as Delphic rhapsodies , bitt coarser and meaner .
There is indeed one argument into -which abhorrence positivel y forbids our entering ; it is the argument that unless the subject of this sermon were more than a martyr in the intolerable agony of the suffering endured , he was something less than a martyr ; for we are told of " shrinking , " "dread , " " anguish of mind" unknown to the martyrs of the Church , to men , to feeble women , or even to Socrates ! There is the gross suggestion of a contrast here , which is hazarded in the very insolence of dogmatism .
And this is the picluxe which Oxford paints of The Martyr ; this is the Oxford interpretation of the Atonement 1 We will not characterise it . All who can apprehend its hideous meaning , where the red light comes through the dark cloud of mystic nonsense , must be driven to take refuge in . the mild and simple light , which Benjamin Jowett has thrown upon the subject , and in which the believer * The Sermon is published in London by John Hbnkt nod Jamkb Paiuisjsh ; wo could wish , that every one of our reudora should procure it , and study it for himself . " Wo luivo groatfy abridged the passages quoted ; wo have , however , uaod none but Dr . ( Joulbum ' s words , andi wo believo that wehavonot -warped Jus meaning .
even of the Church of England , can walk reconciled to the Creation and to its Divine government .
March 8, 1856.] The L E A Pffi B. 231
March 8 , 1856 . ] THE L E A Pffi B . 231
== ($)Fflu Cotwttl T *
( JDpett Cmtnril
[Iy Ikis Dspakihsst, As Am, Opiniok-S Ho...
[ iy IKIS DSPAKIHSST , AS AM , OPINIOK-S HOWITBE BXIK 3 KB , " AKE ALLOWED AN EXPBBSSIOH , TUB BDITOB HBOHSBA . BD-T HOLDS HIMSJILE RESPONSIBLE FOB NONE . ]
There I3 No Learned Man But Will Confess...
There i 3 no learned man but will confess be liath much profited tiy reading controversies , his senses awaiened , and nis judgment sharpened . If , then , it be profitable for him to read , -why alumld it not , at least , be tolerable for his adversary to write T—Mixton .
An" Historical Study. (To The Editor Of ...
AN" HISTORICAL STUDY . ( To the Editor of the Leader . ) Sir , —To realise the future in the instant— -to see an -event as it passes in the same aspect which it will wear some twenty years hence , is a thing notoriously difficult . Nevertheless , an attempt of this sort is generally amusing , and may- be instructive . I was present in the House of Lords on the first night of the Wensleydale Peerage debate , and so struck was I with the whole scene , that I have been tempted to set it forth as an historical study . Some future historian may perhaps write thus : —
About this time a number of the London Gazette appeared announcing 4 > hat her Majesty had conferred upon Sir James Parke , one of the most distinguished judges on the Bench , the dignity of Baron Wensley * dale for the term of his natural life . Hitherto the peerage had been hereditary . . Forthwith the Press teemed with arguments in favour of the innovation of life-peers , and against it . Parliament had-scarcely assembled when the leaders of Opposition denounced the proposed . change ,, and -predicted the destruction of the Constitution ; At- length notice of a motion , on the subject .-was given , and a thousand conjectures as to the result of that motion distracted the town ..
Accordingly , on " Thursday , the 8 th of Febiuary , 1856 , the HoueeofLords presented a sqene as striking as it iwas instructive . The substantial question was , wiefcher it , was legal , and constitutional for the _ Queen to create liferPeers , who should sit and vote in Parliament . - £ fh . e Lords were alarmed ; the public were interested ; the galleries and the bar of the House were crowded , with spectators . The occasion'was no common occasion , for it might be the . opening p £ < a conflict between prerogative and privilege .
To see the venerable Lyndhursfc , four-score and upward—the wreck of one of the handsomest men in his time—led . in tottering and halfrblind to that seat amongst the hereditary Peers of England which he had won by his transeendant but prostituted abilities , rise in his place , and for nearly two hours , without a single memorandum , sustain a learned and elaborate argument in defence of his order , with the same delightful voice , the game unfaltering eloquence , and
the same persuasive perspicuity with , which lie had charmed that House some thirty years ago , was a spectacle which those who witnessed it . will noi ; easily forget . Nor was this the only memorable incident in that debate an which the Lords put forth all their strength to ^ this attack made upon a wealthy hereditary order by the intrusion of life-Peers , however illustrious . Of a truth the champions were strangely marshalled . There stood Edward Sugden
—the precocious child of the Truentt of hiB timeonce a barrister ' s clerk , now the Coke of his day , eager in defence of his long-desired , but late-acquired > hereditary dignity , side by side with Edward Geoffrey , fourteenth Eaa ! of Derby , who , in his vehement passion to maintain the purity and the dignity of his oi-der , not only ennobled the blood of the long-neglected Sugden , but adorned the ranks of the Peerage with , all the amphibious scions of his house . There , on the benches opposite to his early friend and political associate , Lansdowno — that aged and consistent Whig—stood the fantastic Henry Brougham , his tongue once the denouncer of kings , the trumpet of revolution , the idol of his countrymen , now mere sounding brass and a tinkling cymbal . Thexe stood plain John Campbell , some fifty years ago a" stranger
in London , the friendless Bon of a Scotch Presbyterian minister , who , by sturdy poraeverance and solid ability , at length achieved the descent from the Gallery of the Reporters to the stops of the Thronerevealing by his every look and gesture the struggling atory of his early life , but yqt speaking on behalf of hereditary nobility with oil the weight of the Lord Chief Justice of ftugland—aide by side with George Douglas Campbell , the eighth Duko , Murquia and Earl of Argyll , and with Henry Goorge Grey , Earl Grey , the representative of an , onoiont and ULuatrious housetho champions of the now creation . To sec the noblemen of yesterday clamorous for hereditary honours , and tho noblemen of anoient lineago willing to admit into their rankB PeorB fox- life , may to some men noom . Btrjxnge . But , in truth , tho thing ia admirably natural . Hod I the pen of the Preacher I might lament over human vanity ; hod I tho pen of
Swift , I might anatomise human weakness . To the wise man my reflections would be tedious , to the dull man useless . Therefore , let the curtain fall . « » * a
Amended Statutes. (To The Editor Of The ...
AMENDED STATUTES . ( To the Editor of the leader . ') Sin , —Oxford -is laughing in her sleeve at the public , who think she is becoming liberal . Will it be believed that . in the amended statutes of Corpus , published last week , it is laid down that the college shall contain * ' two Acolytes , or at least such -as Eave the -first clerical tonsure ? " That besides , every fellow- shall not only , declare his conformity to the Church of England , but tbat any time
after his election he may be tried for heresy' by the senior members of ; the college , wko . may deprive * , him of bis . fellowship . . But he may appeal ; and to whom does the reader think ? To the Bishop of Winchester ; and to no other . That is iio say , a 'High Church majojority among the ^ fellows , if secure of -a High Church bishop , may glut their personal or religious spite against a Reforming , Low , or Broa d Churchman , and deprive him of Ms income without possibility of redress .
In Exeter's amended statutes we find the following ( Stat . iii ., art . i . ) : — " No one may be elected a fellow except members of the Church of England or of some Church inccnnmv / nwn with it / ' "After all , " the Wesleyan may say , " this is fair enough . " Not so fast , my good sir ; you don't belong to any Church at all ; you have-no bishops , ? no apostolicaL succession . The sons of our " erring sister" ofRome , or of _ Holy Euasia , these , though not all we could wish , we would receive and cherish ; but a profane vulgar of rniddleKslass schismatics , to come betw « en the wind and our orthodox gentility—we have not quite come to that yet .
Moreover , " If any fellow shall cease to be a member of the Church of * England ) <« *> $ some Church in communion with . it , it ^ shalliibe ¦? . lawful for"the visitor to s proceed to the deprivation ¦*> £ ¦ > . & uchfollow . " ? No \ y : this visitor is the Bishop of Exeter . Whoever disbelieves in baptismal regeneration is considered by that prelate to be no inember of the Church' 6 f 'England . How on sueh a . point tMs worthy can unite the bullying tone of the schoolboy with the pedantry of the schoolmaster ,. your readers know- ; yetin ! the Oorham case an appeal ' lay against him to the Privy Council . . Now , -whatever moderation he may have thought it prudent to exhibit ' will not be needed , for Oxford . proposes- to settle her own matters at once , and secretly , and not to trouble the public with the ¦ wearisome details of a public trial .
One more extract , fromanoiiher college . "If it become known to the rector ( of Lincoln ) and to , the majority of the fellows , that any fellow has maliciously and contumaciously favoured any heretical opinion in public or private , he shall be removed from our college for ever , unless within six days he ^ submits himself to the rector and humbly undergoes correction . " " Sir , cdvum theologicum is a plant , ttat needs little cultivation . Yet these " amended statutes " are most skilfully preparing the field and the soil , where it may excel , as it has hitherto excelled , the rankest and most prolific growths of England . The worst of the
Oxford Statutea -were rapidly becoming obsolete . -By pruning some of the most harmless , the rest will sprout with renewed « nad most perniciouB Btrengjih . The fact is , Oxford has throughout grossly abused the patience of a country tolerant of her f 6 llie , because fond of her . antiquities . For the last two centuries she has been the one fatal obstruction to the enlargement of the Church , and the nationalising of education . When open defiance of Reform would avail no longer , she has seen the policy of bending to
the storm , of spontaneously amending her statutea , and of securing privately a firm , footing for future aggression and annoyance . But if the splendid revenues of Oxford are ever to be national , and if every earnest and independent thinker is not to bo a prey to the blind instincts and zealous pedantry of Oxford Common Booms , let Mr . Heywood call the attention of Parliament to the London Gazette of Feb . 9 th , containing the " amended statutes , " the first fruits of Oxford Reform . . 1 am , Sir , ; Your obedient servant , Oxford , Feb . 22 . Oxoniensib .
Another Emperor.—The World Counts One Em...
Another Emperor . —The world counts one Emperor more . ICwaa , brother-in-law of one of the petty kings of Abyssinia , after dethroning lus relative , hfts assumed tho Imperial crown , under the . name , pf Theodore I . Australia . —Trado , according to tlie lost accounts from AuBfciftlift , was in a more flquwalung condition than it had been ; and the rej ^ rta fro m tho gold , fields are highly aatisftvetory , the yiold being largo , and tho minors in a prosperoua condition . The . new coiiatltution has boon proclaimed at'JWColbourue . Sir Charl «» Hothflun , in ^ his . jatpopoh . on the , flpeniifig . o . f th © JLegteJa . - tivo Council ,, eald ho believed tho colony would 1 > nearly free from debt by the end- Of the year .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), March 8, 1856, page 15, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_08031856/page/15/
-