On this page
-
Text (2)
-
1Q7 J THE LEAD EH.
-
DEBIT AND CREDIT. Debit and Credit. A No...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Ttf| : ^Or Novembeb 7, 1857.1 ^ _
general information and some literary ability , but as having no claim whatever to be considered a philosopher at all- others allow that he ha ^ vriUen h ^ cou S ^ t ^' 110151 bu V * £ ? * desultory , immethodicaWalvth ^ ?« t 2 ? nLv ^ ^ * ^ - ? Mnk am <> ngSt thinkers . But to the Tlrl ^ tfF' uf ° n S wntin f s have a ^« ys proved the greatest perplexity . Ae foln ^ f ° # + \ ° T * " ° Vitd i ™ th somethin S of the rich variety , ShlSSSS ? ° . k J th ^ Seness and irregularity of nature herself , was a felV V ^ f ; ^ erstand , and it is amusing enough to see how ? fe ^ Atte ^ ted _ ^ ^ - 9 ^ cours e , it must § t in somewhere , as 7 assumed to he
~ £ Snl T complete , but it was so difficult to discover SZ ^ - " ^/ f W ! XS - Even with the advantage of many Procrustean beds instead of one , which is the peculiarity of modern systems , it vas found difficult to accommodate the English philosopher . First , on the strength of some kindly expressions towards natural magic , he was placed on the bed of the mystics , and though it proved a preposterously snort one , it was determined , by stretching the passages in question , that He had certainly made the bed , and must therefore lie in it . Then , as his Tmtings abounded with references to nature , he was crushed into the narrow bed of the metaphysical naturalists , though it was an outrage on common S (
£ t *« . PP ° se that he could stay there . Finally , after other similar -efforts , the majoritydecided that he fitted the bed of ^ the sensationalists best , and after lopping oif what was superfluous , they laid the truncated remains of his thought there in peace . Dr . Fischer thus stands alone -amongst his countrymen , in having , as the volume before us proves that he has , iairly studied Bacon ' s works , and fully appreciated their spirit and purpose . He patiently follows the development of Bacon ' s thought , interprets its special significance at every step , shows what a strict connexion there is between the parts , and what a large and vital unity it possesses as a whole . He does this , too , not like a Germanbut like an Englishmanin a
, , simple and natural manner , without pedantry or affectation , and iu language iree from . technicahties of every kind . The volume sketches in outline the whole course of Bacon ' s thought , and is thus a valuable introduction to the study of his works . To have such a volume from Germany is certainly a good sign , one amongst many other recent ones that go to show that Bacon is now beginning to be not only read but studied , both in England ana on the Continent , and what is more important still , that the deeper spirit oi his writings , his heroic confidence in nature , and intense love of reahty , are growingly recognized and appreciated . Fischer
^ Dr . eomaiences his outline of Bacon ' s philosophy by a short sketch of Jua life and character , and he does this from the conviction that the one will necessarily throw light on the other , that a man ' s life furnishes to some extent a key to his writings , that in the history of every man , but -especially of every distinguished man , there will be found a substantial harmony between his character and his works . Bacon ' s character hasbeen a great difficulty to his biographers , and Macaulay , in his brilliant Essay , has rather increased the perplexity instead of helping to remove it . The antithesis between the moral and intellectual in the character of the hero—' . greatest , wisest , meanest of mankind' — -was in fact too tempting to be resisted ; and yielding to the impulse of his nature , which prompts him to -sacrifice ti uth and sobriety of statement to point and dramatic effect , Macaalay c xaggerated this superficial antithesis into an insoluble problem . Dr . Fischei attempts , and as it seems to us successfully , an explanation . the apparent anomaly . He happily seizes the moral features of Bacon ' s character , which made him at once practically weak and intellectually strong . The following is the passage in which he points out what he takes to be the moral key of his character : —
David Hume was right when he missed in Bacon that firmness of character which we call the moral power of resistance . We know of no philosopher more clastic than Bacon . He possessed to the highest degree the power and the impulse to expand . himself beyond all bounds , but the power of resistance he lacked ; he yielded to a pressure , and allowed himself to be driven into a corner by the overwhelming force of circumstances . He could augment and dimmish , with the same natural facility , without being affected , either in his higher or his lower position , by an excessive sensibility , -which in the one case would have stimulated his pride , in the other -would have too painfully depressed him . Hence it was that the man , who excelled all others an intellectual power , and imprinted a new form of mind upon his age , at the same time presented a soft material capable of receiving the impression from any hand that happ « ned to be powerful . This elastic power constitutes , as it were , the type of his individuality , in which all his politics , his virtues as well as his foibles , harmonize with each-other . Here we can perceive that his character id consistent with , itself . From this point we explain the peculiar turns of his life , his vicissitudes , even his ¦ extremest aberrations .
It is perfectly evident to us that such an intellectual power , fitted as it was to strive towards a great end , and , at the same time , to penetrate into minuluu , could not fail to produce extraordinary results in the region of science ; that it was especially made to awaken a new life hi this region , and that , above all , it corresponded to liacon ' s own scientific tendency , namely , the progression from particular to general laws . If we imagine the same power placed in the midst of social intercourse , we find that this . rich , versatile mind , affable to every person , accessible to every form of life , contains within itaelf all the talents that constitute the agreeable companion . Bacon possessed by nature all those qualities which have aright to shine in society ; he united the weighty -with the light , not by deliberate art , but by dint of natural grace . His command ov « t ^ M « da tt «» perfect , both in public orations and in private converge . Aocoiding to the testimony of Ben" Jonaon , liacon was an orator whom one never gre-w weary of heariag . But tluavwy . povret , which , in science and social lifo finds and
bo brilliant lofty an expression , acquires quite' another aBpect wl » an its acU are © f a moral kind ; the moral clement is for such a form of individuality the moat uncongenial and the moat dangerous . There is no elastic morality ; and Bacon ' s moral nature was as elastic , as facile , aa completely directed towards practical ends , and as compliant with circumstances , as his intellect . It quite accorded with the key-note of hia individuality . Hero is the perceptible harmony of his character , -which has often escaped notice , or ( as in the case of Mr . Macaulay ) ha 3 l ) cen missed altogether . "We see in Bacon ' s moral character , its compared with his intellect , not a distinct ba & ttg , but only the shadow of hi « individunlity , which grow larger an its substance increased in power and importance . Elastic morality is lax . Moral virtue deirmndH , above everything , a firm , tough , obstinate power of resistance , for it consists in a victorious struggle with the allurement * and temptations of life . If this power of resistance has ita fulcrum in the natural disposition of the individual , it is n talent . Now this moral talent was wanting iu Bucon ' u nature ; and the virtue that
corresponds to it -was therefore wanting in his life All tho ,,, ftT ., MT , ""— = his life have their real foundation *^ thta absence o ^* £ ^ ~ ^\^ S » re resisting power ; in that mental facility which gave suTck ^ ao ^ L ^ T ^ Want of his scientific , and so grievously crippled his moral enemies ^ "mnatioa to 1 row Bacon ' s life he proceeds to his Method ; the ' central p oint nf , i , he lucidly characterizes as follows : — p 11 L ol which Every rigid course of thought is determined by twto nointa , that fm ™' , lA proceeds , and tLat to which it tends ; the former is the starting-ohithe . w ? " the goal . The question is , whieh of these two points is first mfen first ™ i I 1 S a the mind ; whether the thought first settles its startin g- ^ n ' t , £ nd > Ei k logical progress seeks its goal , or whether it first takes a clear view o ? L Si Lf then considers which road it must pursue , and from what point it miS ; * S \ S Logical thought is possible in both cases ; but iu the former case theLode o 1 ? , is different from that in the latter . There , my first thought is the ^ . nls a d S further course of ideas consists solely of legitimate conclusions . Mere ' mv fll 5 thought is the goal , and with respect to that my premiss is framed . Here I « , «„ thus : this is my goal which stands as something necessary , and to be attainedTS events ; now such and such are the means which will bring me to that eud nndtw ^ J ^™* ™ ° «*«!* ? link ? «* « - » 7 starting-point tndt
. ^™ - ^ ^ . . , this sense my premiss . Thus I reason from the goal to the startin-point I ' rZ conclusions arc rightly drawn , the course of my ideas is unquestionably logical ( col sequent ) ,. hut its order and its direction are diametrically opposite to those of the other course ot ideas which from the given starting-point proceeds to the not-given l al Both modes of thought are legitimate , but they differ both in course and intendeW Each has its own point of view , and a anethpd depending upon it If the thouX tends to a principle , its guiding-point is an axiom ; if it teiids to a goal that is to be attained its guiding-point is a problem . Axioms suggest deductions : problem require solution In the one case , I ask , what will follow from this principle ? In the other , how shall I solve this problem ? In both cases lo-ical and methodical thought is required The hrst method may . be called that of deductions , the second-that of solution ; the former is the synthetic , the latter the analytic method . For every deduc tion is a synthesis , every solution is . an analysis .
^ Now I . maintain that a mind whose first thought is not a principle , but a problem to besolyed , and which begins by proposing to itself a goal that is to be reached , — 1 maintain , I say , that such a mind must think analytically ; and in this its natural course of ideas must be followed and represented by us . First it apprehends the problem—the goal that hovers before it in . the distance—then the means of Solution in a regular sequence down to the fust link , which offers the scientific starting-point for the solution itself . l Such a mind was the mind of Bacon . ISTot a principle , but a problem constitutes the first thought and guiding-point of his whole philosophy . He first clearly apprehends his goaL then he reflects on the right means for "infallibly attaining it . Through the whole course Of his ideas he never turns his eyes from this goal , but alwayskeeps it steadily in view . This setting up of goals belonged to the nature of his thought , which was therefore thoroughly analytical iu its method . Bacon himself thought a he wished science in general to thiuk ; that is to say , he analysed things . . . .
Why , then , did he choose this one particular road , and this one particular end ? Here what has just ' uow appealed a necessary thougbt Uocauies a mere arbitrary caprice ; and it is as a necessary sequence of thought that the Baconian philosophy is to be comprehended and exhibited . This is impossible , so long as it is synthetically treated ; and that which to Bacon himself was an inference or an intermediate proposition is laid down as a fundamental principle . It is useless to repeat over and over again that IJacon set out from experience . We may just as well say that Columbus was a navigator , -while the principal point is that he discovered America . Mere navigation was as little the leading thought of Columbus as mere experience was the leading thought of Bacon .
1 he remainder of the volume is occupied with the working out of Bacon ' s plan as seen in . his works , and with a sketch of the relation in which he stands to the philosophers of the same school who succeeded him , and who have since brilliantly developed and systematized his thought . We have only to add that Mr . Oxenford has translated the volume with his well-known ability , so that throughout it reads like an original English work .
1q7 J The Lead Eh.
1 Q 7 J THE LEAD EH .
¦ - ;¦ [ o- 398 , November V , 1557 .
Debit And Credit. Debit And Credit. A No...
DEBIT AND CREDIT . Debit and Credit . A Novel . Translated from the German of Gustav Freytag , by L . O . C . With a 1 ' refiiee by C- C . J . Jiunsen . 2 vols . Edinburgh : Constable and Co . DcJ / U and Credit . A Novel . By Gustav Freytag . From the Original , witli the sanction of the Author , I > y Mrs . Malcolm . Bentley . The Chevalier Bunsen states that , upon the publication of this novelin Germany , it attained an innnediate success , and went through six expensive editions in less . than two years . He is profuse in his praise of tlio work , which is undoubtedly one of the most popular of the German school that has appeared within the century . There is room , consequently , for the versions produced at Edinburgh and in London . Mr . Constable has
presented the translation of L .. C . O . in the most attractive form , the book being printed clearly , on good paper , in two light volumes , prefaced by an elaborate criticism from the pen of the Chevalier Bunsen . For Mr ^ Heutley , however , Mrs . Malcolm has interpreted the story from the _ original , with apparently equal accuracy—at all events in almost identical language , except where the original is more elaborately followed—and it forms one neat volume appropriate for current and casual reading . Probably , both the translations will receive a largo and . immediate acceptation . The novel contains all tho eloincnts of popularity . It is fresh , rich in incident , vital with character , thought , and fancy , and in all respects an uncommon , genuine , interesting book- The humour is not broad , but
quiet ; the irony glaucea out in sudden , mild , lmidmtians , imd the narrative ia one of unbroken strength and consistency . Gustav Preyta ^ na tho preface informs us , is not a iendeitci / writer ; ho has not been seduced by the hack notion assiduously propounded in defence of didactic mediocrity , that a novel has a purpose beyond and above artistic excellence , ami that if it oduciites the conscience the literary purist objects in vain : as if the moral did not suflcr when awkwardly or weakly enforced . Soil and llaben has a moral , but the author does not disdain being an artist . Without suggesting that this work is tho expression of a formula , its object may be doscribed to be the development of a view , insisLing upon tlie weceHiity of a more Christian i ' usion uiuong the diiTerent classes of society , nnd prophesying , for the middle orders , a future supremo preponderance in thu world .
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Nov. 7, 1857, page 18, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_07111857/page/18/
-