On this page
-
Text (1)
-
: .M«feil«5.J fHOE LHA3)aSB. «BL
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Imperial Parliament. The Sardinian Conti...
touahvag the definition , of what constitute a . newa--Smr , wero O «^ d , to . r-A . clause , ^ enabling the SemRfcerad proprietor tof . a newspaper to sue ana -toe sued , wshioh . was objected tobyMx . ( J ., E © ttt on the ground , that , as uv other joint-stock companies , all Jhe ( proprietors should be equally liable , was postponed to the third roading ^ T-he GBAveshwa of the Exchequer then moved the introduction , of a holause giving theprotectionof a . capyright of twenty-Jfour hours to oer-tain articles in newspapers . He thought this protection . neoessary cConsidering they iwere about to , oxpoae the established daily papers , which are produced at a very large outlay , to an
excessive competition with cheap journals , which would live upon pirating their more honest contemporaries . He , therefore , moved the insertion of a clause , enacting that the proprietors of every newspaper should , for the purpose of protection against piracy , be entitled to a twenty-four hours' copyright in every original article , letter , paragraph , communication , and composition which should be for the first time published in such newspaper in this country ; that a penalty , not lessthan 57 . nor more than 30 / ., should be imposed upon offenders , and that a power of summons should be given to stipendiary magistrates and justices , who should be entitled to adjudicate at once .
Mr . W . hxtesidb observed that this clause proposed jto place & check upon printing , and to limit the benefit of the electric telegraph . It was satisfactory , however , to know that the clause was wholly impracticable . He admitted that original articles should be protected ; but there ought not to be a copyright in bare facts .---Mr . Pwnn spoke in favour of the clause , and said that the London papers publish at half-past six in the morning , and that by half-past eight or nine a newspaper might be circulated through the town , containing all the leading articles , all the chief items of news , and all the
miscellaneous contents . He coutended that this would be a great grievance and wrong . He thought , nevertheless , that a copyright of twenty-four hours' duration was too long , and that six or eight hours would be sufficient . Further , he thought distance should be considered as well as time . —Mr . J . G . Philli-M OBE believed it was impossible to establish any right of property in news . It would puzzle the most acute literary powers to define the nature of the copyright granted by the clause . —Mr . Bentinck . thought there should be no copyright in anonymous articles , and held that the proposed clause would ruin the
whole country press . Mr . Milneu Gibson * recognised the question of abstract justice involved in the clausej but he looked upon it as utterly impracticable . Piracy exists already , and he did not see that it would increase under the new state of things . The question was entirely apart from the question of the penny stamp ; and he was disposed to wait and see if the evil was one to require legislation . His friend , the member for Stoke ( Mr . Ricardo ) , had been charged by the Times with piracy for sending , in- his capacity as chairman of the Electric Telegraph Company , news
to the country papers which had been derived from the Times ; but he would leave it to Mr . Kicardo to explain the precise course of proceeding . He believed that all the telegraphs are worded in this way : " The Times says so and so . " These things could not be stopped . The editor of a country 5 aper has a collector of news in London , just as the lines has a collector of news at Vienna or elsewhere . The collector of news in London sends down what news he hears , and it would be monstrous to make him responsible for a piece of nows which he might have obtained from an independent source , and wliioh might also have appeared in a London
The Somcxtou-Generax , in defending the clause , acknowledged that there was force in some of the objections urged against it : still , it should be recollected that there is nothing about " news" in it , and that therefore the oppugners of the proposal had been arguing against what did not exist . The clause endeavoured to establish nothing more than mere justico to authors in newspapers . Two or three yoars ago , a paper was published called the Politician , which appeared about half-past nine in the morning , and which consisted of all the leading articles of the morning papers und their moat important announcements . The principal newspapers combined in an endeavour to put it down ; but from the state of the law it was found difficult and hardly possible to accomplish this by legal proceedings . The Solioitor-Geueml admitted that the remedy for this state of things involves difficulties ; but they might bu
overcome . Mr . Moisckxon Mii . nuh hoped the Solicitor-General would pause to consider the subject before pressing it on the ConunilU'e ; ami Lord Stam . hv hold that it is impossible , by the utmost legal ingenuity » to distinguish between fact * and comments , and that it ' would bo absurd to regard a colourable " abridgment of matter as pirney , winee two writur . s might ; ueuidcuvtalJy striko out the mime line of argument and only differ in words , and in that cam ! the one might bo accused of pirating from the other .
• Mr . < VK ., . Jr 4 fox contead / ed > tha $ * he London duti . y newspapers should have an interact , in tha & fac # ? hich they havefpaid ,. and tlxat the-cpuntry journals ought to give a ; money . consideration , for the newa » which they derive-from their metropolitan contemporaries . ( Some persons seemed to despise newspaper , writing because iti & anonynicius . . But why , is it , anpny , mous ? It is so , for the convenience of-those arrangements by which several writers are made to co-operate as one body . Their joint action in the production of a newspaper-is analogous to a cabinet council , . for the
( Conclusions of which * no individual , minister is . responsible . Why , anonymous contributions to the newspapers became some of the classics of the country . The ?• Letters x > f Junitt * " were anonymous contributions to a newspaper , arad the " Letters of Runny raede" produced . cpnsiderable effect , and , would have their importance in the political , history of the times . ( Hear , hear , and laughter . ) It is . owing to the feeling created by communications of . this kind that that inquiry is now going on , without which they would not have known the real causes that reduced our army in the Crimea to such , a forlorn
condition . Mr . Ricardo opposed the clause , , and said jthat when the list of the killed and wounded at the battles > of Alma and Inkecman arrived , before half . an hour that list was transmitted to all the principal towns in the United Kingdom—to Aberdeen and Glasgow on the . one hand , and to Plymautlnand Exeter , on . the other . He must say that he should look with , great alarm to a » y law that should ? Br « veat intelligence of that kind , which was of public . and oiniversalantexest , from being transmitted through ; the country as soon as possible . He JUo 4 Jao fear of cheap newspapers corrupting the morals of the people . Qn the eonte > ary , he thought nothing would tend more to improve their morals . At any rate , it was for them to say whether or not they would
buy-Mr . Bright said , in answer to charges of piracy which had been brought against a Manchester threepenny daily paper , that that very paper published in Manchester the news of the battle of Alma just one day before it was . published in London . The newspapers in Manchester ( he asserted ) are published by persons having large capital- Some of them have able correspondents in continental cities ; and he asked if , when these correspondents transmit messages by telegraph , which may be nearly the same , or quite the same , as those transmitted to the London newspapers , is that to be held to be a piracy ; and if the proprietors of the London journals might go down to Manchester and summon these respectable men , the editors of the Manchester papers , before tw o j ustices of the peace ?
Mr . Disraeli was opposed , to a copyright in news because he did not think that it was possible , or , if possible , that it would be vexatious . But he held that it was but fair to give every available protection to the costly productions of the London daily press ; and therefore , making an especial reference to the Times , he should support the amendment that-would bo proposed , that newspapers shouldcirculate through the post without any limitation of weight . He believed that there was no fear for the honest paper
even without a copyright ; for the public would always have the best article and the earliest intelligence . With respect to anonymous writing , he observed that sonie of the noblest books in the world had been published anonymously . —Lord Lovaine was of opinion that the press should not be protected because it deals in " all sorts of calumnios" and is " a libeller of private character ; " and the Chancellor of the Exchequer , after the expression of the House ' s feeling upon the subject , withdrew the
clause . Mr . Milnes tjien moved the insertion of a clause , giving the privilege of transmission and retransmission by the post to every periodical publication published at intervals not exceeding seven days , and the superficies of which shall not exceed 3500 inches of printed matter , for a penny stamp . Mr . Milnes passed a very high eulogy on the character of the press , and said of some members of it that they neither flatter the vanity , heighten the prejudices , nor defend the errors of any political clique , but hold the balance between the fluctuating opinions of society , and are so conducted , that ho could not lay them down
without the impression that he had been conversing with the wisest and most liberal minds of the time . When confident , their confidence is justified by events ; when doubtful , it is bacause the evidence is imperfect . —Mr . Cowan said that , at tho request of his friends , he would abandon his amendment in favour of an unrestricted size . ;—Lord Stanley called attention to the discrepancy between charging a penny for the half ounce of a letter , and allowing a newspaper , weighing six ounces , transmission and retransmission for the same sum . —Mr . Lowh , in answer to this , said that if they took the letters aa thoir guide , and put the same rato on newspapers , they would exclude newspapers from tho post ; if they took the newspaper for their guide , they would make nn immense invasion on the Post-ofilco revenue , and the result would be that an immense number of lotturs would bo sent in one largo envelope to a person who
, would distribute them , and a trade ,, of that kin * , wtfuld ^ softn spring up . OGbe Pest-oflwe , wiw ; est » - rblished ^ for the purpose , of ! carrying letters ; , if it 4 « 3 inot carry a single newspaper , it would'be impossible to deduct materially fjqom the expense of the estflr blishment . When Mr . . Rowland Hill-was asked whftt ( deduction , could be made , he said , ** Y < evy little , indeed . " The tenth with regard to the newspapers w » s this , that the Poet-office , existing for carrying letters and having , a surplus ability to carry other matter , rand the House considering that the conveyance ^ newspapers was a matter of public utility ,, they chose to carry newspapers at a rate-infinitely cheaper than letters . Mr . Lowe then entered in a variety , of details with respect to the Times newspaper , and contended that , although he did not desire a eqpy >
right , it was only just that , that publication / should have the power of transmitting its full-sized -sheet without the extra halfjjecny . —iMr . Mw ^ br Gibson opposed this view , thinking the profit of the extra advertisements quite , sufficient , to compensate fpr the extra-, itax . —Mr > E . Bau < -defended the motion . —My iQasyjKOKD said that , though he objected altogether to the press , he must support the motion ; for the tlimitationtof size he looked upon as a dishonest blow aimed . At one particular establishment , which was csrfcsiniy * lie cleverest of any . —The Chancellor of the E . xc « B 42 crj 3 > R observed that the object . of the bill then before-the House was simply to remove the compulsory stamp ; and , he thei ? efpRe deprecated -entering into other rand . discrepant changes . —Upon a . division , the motion-w ^ s ljastiby a , <* aajpiiijby of . 174 .
SJgE . KJ & AXES G . JftAT % BBrFS . On Tuesday , Lord E * xam * s , in « eply to Lord Taiibot , stated * hat ,. safter inquiry . , be entertained ' a hope Hiat the experiment about to be 4 , ried < with regard to the floating batteries would be found to be successful . — Lord Harjjwicke thought the answer very unsatisfactory , and he might add , from personal examination , that the experiment was likely to be anything but successful . He stated that the floating batteries are very ill constructed , and will be found too heavy . He had no doubt that a shell from a mortar would go right through the deck . —After some further discussion , in which Lords Gbey and JOekby took part , the subject dropped .
CATALBY IN THE CRIMEA . Lord Hardinge , in reply to Lord Vivian , stated that the cavalry force in . the Crimea at the last advices amounted to 1300 men . In a very short time this number would be increased to 3000 sabres .
THE BIEGE . In the House of Commons , in reply to Mr . Warner , Sir Charles Wood stated that a telegraphic despatch received that day from Lord Raglan mentioned that the Russian force stationed on the Belbek and at Mackenzie ' s Farm had been reinforced by two' divisions . — -In reply to Mr . French , Sir Charles said that the electric telegraph -would remain under the control of the Government , but that he would not say it would be entirely confined to the Government service . ADMINISTRATION OF XHE 4-KMY .
Mr . Frederick . Peel , in reply to Mr . Dunoombe , said the report of the commission of military men who had been sent out to Paris by the late War Secretary , for the purpose of examining the French system of military administration had been received , and he did not think there would be any objection to produce it ; but he would answer the question on a future day . The Loan Bill was read a third time , and passed .
BIAYNOOTH . After a prodigious number of petitions had been presented upon the subject , Mr . Spooner moved a resolution pledging the House to resolve itself into a committee for the purpose of considering the aots for the endow men t of the College of Maynooth , with a view to tho withdrawal of auy endowment out of the Consolidated Fund , due regard being had to vested rights or interests . In a speech of great length , Mr . Spooner contended that the endowment is a gross national ein , and sanctions a systematic violation of tho Protestant constitution of this country . The evidence contained in the recent report from the Maynooth Inquiry Commissioners ho denounced as little bettor than a sham ami a deceit ; _ and he which
strongly commented on tho criminal I ****? . allowed certain portions of tho evidence withheld _ by the commissioners to bo sonfc to Rome before publication . It was clear , he said , upon the face of the report , that it must have been altered without the consent of the two Protestant commissioners , Lord Harrowby and Dr Twiss- yet , evon under these circumstances , it contained enough to show that the teaching at the college is as objectionable as ever . He than cited ¦ portions of tlw ovidonoo to prove that tho doctrines sanctioned at Maynooth are of tho most , . ultramontane nature , encouraging montul reservation and equivocation , and presenting all the worst futures of IVpory . Ho held that it would bo no broachot faith to withdraw tho endowment , aiuce that hod been A
: .M«Feil«5.J Fhoe Lha3)Asb. «Bl
: . M « feil « 5 . J fHOE LHA 3 ) aSB . « BL
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), May 5, 1855, page 3, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_05051855/page/3/
-