On this page
-
Text (1)
-
September 3, 1853.] THE LEADER, 855 ' ¦¦...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
¦ The Governing Classes'. No. L—Jliul Im...
father nor of the mother , there has to "be superadded the accident of that special shaped head which permits a philosophical temperament . ' Perhaps the Jew is your only preper cosmopolitan ; and . we have seen in the career of Mr . Disraeli in Great Britain ample evidence of the advantage it is to an ambitious man to be without a country ; he becomes the true citizen of the world—his genius expands with the consciousness of an illimitable public for an audience ; and he sees all
"qu estions" rightly , because national questions are questions of humanity , and he sees them in their entirety . But there is a near approach to the cosmopolitan frequently encountered ; in those cases where the native of one country becomes formally and naturally adopted as a subject in another . Such is the position occupied by that admirable Prince who is consort to Queen Victoria ; and to that happy position is attributable his remarkable success as an English
politician . English statesmen , for the last hundred and fifty years , have been too naucb distinguished by the characteristics of islanders . When English kings owned the larger portion of France , English statesmanship had o-randeur and comprehensiveness ; and the tone of the talk of Normans had a magnificent universality about it . When the Tudors followed , and Henry the Eighth had to manoeuvre for the benefit of Europe between Francis and Charles , it was noticeable that Wolsey and Cromwell had no narrow national prejudices , and that
the Cardinal , who was a conscientious man , loving God and pitying man , and who believed that the world could he blessed were he Pope , would have thought it not only not wrong , but his duty , to sacrifice England if Charles would give him the triple tiara . When Elizaheth held England , and when the battle in Europe was between freedom of thought and slavery of thoughtbetween Protestantism and Popery—her statesmen were less Englishmen than philosophers , and a Cecil or Essex thought it as much a matter of course to spend two or three millions of English money in destroying Philip in the Low Countries , as Sir William Molesworth thinks
it advisable to spend half a million on a new metropolitan bridge , or as "Lord Dudley Stuart would think it proper to send British troops to Hungary against Kussia mid Austria . Just before , in Mary's time , excellent Englishmen desired to gee England a Spanish province , believing that a universnl enlightened despotism would be best , however much their countrymen preferred parochinlity to mankind . When the Charleses had relatives in the Palatinate , whom it was only decent to Hustnin , England enjoyed the rule of statesmen
who took broad views of the usefulness of England in . Knropo ; and the second Charles certainly did not concoal his opinion that ifc was his personal interest to hack the policy of the Grand Monarquo with the map o ( Em-ope : Charles having got a good deal out of in-Milarit . y of mind by ] , is travels . When William of Ornnj » o got i , l , o English throne he proved a great man ; !» i < l Mr . Mncuulay , who himself has tho advantage of "i double country , admires William inordinately , bc-< 'au . so William nought England for tho sako of the I «» v Countries . When a Pretender was added to the political characters of Great Britain , British statesmen ,
< Ji * both . sides , Loyalists , and Whigs , and Hanoverians , were compelled to sustain themselves by cultivating iM'i-Hoiml and dynastic friemWiip . s in Europe : and this "Mmsifcjr raided tho intellects , and enlarged the ken , of <>>• ' politicians , as was visible in tho philosophic ten-;'"»« M'h , remarked by Pope , of Bolingbroko , and tho "" KlliM-cmco of the great Murlborough , as remarked by woryliody , il () ( , whether the bribes sent to him were 111 I'Vench erown . s or English guineas . But with Wall >> lo begun narrow-minded , insular ntutesniaiiHliip \ n < uva ( , Uril uin . The two lir « fc Grov-es tried to connuui
'U ' li | , IHi 11 WM'iMi ^ imr iniwliiii / kir * w . < 4 . ' . ' 1 .. . l . i -. ;" ' ¦ increasing tendency not to look beyond Bl " % kiiHihI , . KKfrliH ] , iuWnntH ; and occasionally they K " t « million or two spout , and , i thousand or two K "K o » hohalfof Hanoverian intereKlM . But K ,, K-«»« l wuh deepening into ri nation of huckster *; and _ "' polo wan huhI ainetl by them for keeping the pcaeo m Km- » i « ., lul , l brihin- nil tho Kontlomeu o f l . Jn-lami " | I ' ai huinciii . ) to bo lnuTow-ininded and Hellish . "rtlisuu , hiu real huccohhoi" in power , wan inteiifoly itn
Englishman , and confessed his prejudices with the most amusing candour of a belief that he was a great man because he said he didn't care for either French , or Prussian , or Austrian , or Spanish policy , —all he -wanted to advance was English interests ; and undoubtedly this ' one-sided policy did" increase the territory , and added to the practical force * of England as a belligerent against everybody . His son was a greater man ; comprehended great causes ; and nobly spent about five hundred millions sterling ( which is now
represented by a national debt worthy of a great empire ) in suppressing that Corsican dynasty , which has been ( in the shape of a double illegitimacy ) lately revived in Paris . But Pitt was the last of these far-seeing English statesmen ; and n very insular series succeeded him . Peel was the impersonation of the English , spirit — the commercial spirit , which sneers at and doesn't understand the grand jpolitique- —that spirit so exuberant in the distinguished statesman , Mr . Cobden ; and indeed the greatest statesman in England in these days is a
statesman who understands finance , Peel being Premier rather than Wellington for that reason , and Mr . Gladstone being preferred to Mr . Disraeli for no other reason . The compliment is sometimes paid to Lord Palmerston that he is above insularity of statesmanship , and is disposed to believe that the Russian system is a good system for Europe and the East ; but attentive study of that eminent personage does not warrant the belief that he is otherwise than humorously British , evidencing this in his famous remark , that be would
sacrifice everything in Europe to the promotion of the comfort of a civis JBritanicus ; in fact when he went down to his bureau in the evening , his first solicitude was iiow he can advance tlie interests of Jones , and his second , only how he might throw in an occasional fillip to the destinies of humanity . And if an English statesman who has passed his life in the Foreign Office cannot attain to a cosmopolitanism of view , what can we hope of that ill informed ( on European affairs ) set of gentlemen who succeed one another as Ministers in this enlightened
country , and whose completest acquaintance with the affairs of other countries is obtained by reading the clumsily written , but carefully incorrect , correspondence of broken down men about town , who are sent to various capitals of Europe by morning papers ? Our statesmen are the Sir James Grahams and the Sir Charles Woods , and that class of minds ; and their capacity to take the European view in politics was illustrated by their hustings speeches at Carlisle and Halifax , where , though privy councillors of a monarch in alliance with Louis Napoleon , they talked like
taproom British liberals about the blessings of constitiv tional liberty , and the villany of his Majesty the Empcror of tho French in not instituting a Houso of Com . inoiis into which any patriot could buy his way . Our narrow political system is furthermore deprived of the adviintages which might be obtained by bringing in our clover diplomatists , who know tho affairs mid have adopted the views of other nations , and who occasionally let friendly royal allies pay their debts , to expand tho statesmanship of the vehement British clerks who nro right honourable rulers , and whose acquaintance with the continent is confined to u reminiscence that thn
plutcs are never hot in Paris . In our system it Is necessary that a Minister should bo nn actor , and hnvo a capacity to twaddle to ordeiv— " part y governmen t " requiring oratory , nnd oratory requiring training- ; and the result is , that our Henry Bulwers , and NorinuuliyH ; and KodcliilcH , who , by long residence abroad , Ioho healthily a vast ; amount of insular notion , * are excluded from our homo bureaux and Ministerial benches . Even if they did \ y . t oflico , l , hoy would have to affect the Piihncrstoiiian . style , and bo overwhelmingly
parochial and patriotic ; or if they didn't , they would ho treated as Lord' Malmcsbufy was treated — hooted from tho Orkneys to tho Idle of Wight , because ho wished to be friendly to Louis Napoleon ; or hooted us Lord Aberdeen has boon hooted , on tho buro huhpic-ion that ho m enough of a sage to look beyond Bennondsey wliwn bo takes up a map . If llicao views of tho prevalent , perhaps beenuse inevitable , tendencies of British fit atesiuaiiHhip are correct , it will' readily bo admitted that our imperial polity
could not bxit benefit from the accession of Prince Albert to a share in the British Throne . It is true that Queen Victoria has no British blood in her veins ; but the Duke of Kent was a man who was without a policy in politics ; the Duchess of Kent did' not belong to a family with a cause , and was of a character which inclined her to domestic virtues : and her Majesty had the misfortune to be educated by a man who held power without a plan , who had no domestic or commercial policy , and assuredly knew as littl e of foreign
policy as Lord Palmerston could help ; and Lord Melbourne had never the energy—which Lord John Russell subsequently displayed—to conspire a gainst Lord Palmerston . Her Majesty , besides , was educated in England , and saw little of the class who could have taught a young Queen , that as there was no policy at home to look after , the affairs of Europe might bo worth her attention . Had she married an Englishman , as her Majesty's parochial subjects would have desired , the Bermondsey foreign policy was the inevitable foreign
policy of this country ; and even islanders , who are loyal , would not gladly have seen the English monarchy excluded from the freemasonry of kings—the " solidarity" which is the most perfect of all—that of dynasties . From such a fate—the fate of being pronounced bourgeois and vulgar , the English Throne was saved by Prince Albert ; Perhaps he has not quite succeeded in impressing our public men—and , very wisely , he appears to think impressing our public men quite as effective as appealing to our public
—with the full conception of the blague of the Bermondsey policy : bnt it is evident that ho lias done much good , and that he has aimed at performing , more gracefully , the role of William of Orangethe role in which Leopold of Coburg ambitioned to anticipate his nephew . It is said very frequently in society , " What admirable tact is shown b y Prince Albert in not meddling in politics ! " That is tlie remark of Englishmen ; for when they think of politics , they think of the corn-laws , Income-tax , tho cab-act , and the enfranchisement of Peddlinsrton . Prince
Albert , like William the Third , thinks that Englishmen aro fully equal to tax Bermondsey ; and lie does not take any interest in , and does not interfere in , tho arrangements which are made by a Mr . Walpole or a Sir William Molesworth , witli regard to militia franchises , and huts of Ann Ilickses . In these respects wo do not want the statesmanship of his Royal Highness , and we should have quarrelled with him had lie not let
us govern ourselves , through the means of tho governing classes , in our own way . But wo did want the influence of si clever , widely-informed , sympathetic , friendly , but not exclusively British mind , in regard to what is called " foreign a Hairs ; " and that influence , has been exercised , no doubt with excellent effects , by tho Prince Consort . Exercised , no doubt , indirectly , but not less completely . We are suggesting no
impertinence , and nothing unconstitutional in pointing out that fact . That her Majesty is good enough to take an interest in what tho governing classes do for us , in other parts of Europe , was proved , to our national gratification , on the occasion of the quarrel between those distinguished statesmen , Lord John Russell and Lord Palmerston , when it was unreservedly mentioned -o tho House of Commons by the former persona / jo , that his Queen made it a rule to see every despatch of
the Foreign Secretary before it could ho forwarded to its destination . And the happiness of her Miijesfy'n married life is so delightfully patent—her example-in bciiuf happy is , indeed , so repeatedly urged on her . subjects—¦ that it would be affectation to express a doubt but that His Royal Highness's counsel is often nought , and ol ' teu udopted . Let us , at least , hope and bo grateful , ( hat it is so . Let ; ntf only imagine what might ha , ve been
the intensity of tho Ilenhomlsey policy at the tune when the Earl of Granville , ' an eminently nice and porpotually promising young man , was promoted ( via the Board of Trade ) from tho Mastership of the Buckhounds , to tho direction of tho power of ( 1 rent Britain at tho Forei gn Office . Notoriously , indeod , tho appointment of tliat amiable , but not ast < . miHhii > p , nobleman , was only « xouHod by tho governing- elates—i hough it wuh admitted that ho tmoko very good French—on tho ground that
September 3, 1853.] The Leader, 855 ' ¦¦...
September 3 , 1853 . ] THE LEADER , 855 ' ¦¦ — - - ~~~ ' —J ZL' ' " ' . — ¦ . _ . , "* ; . ¦ . ' . *
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), Sept. 3, 1853, page 15, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_03091853/page/15/
-