On this page
-
Text (2)
-
June 2, I860.] The Leader and Saturday A...
-
COAL MINERS AND THE INSPECTION BILL, piA...
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
British Defences. In Despotic Times Gove...
valuable from the statistics which accompany it , and which bring at once before the mind the work we have to do and the distribution , of the resources at our disposal . Our Colonies amount to two and a-half time ' s the area of Europe , and must , as he says , be defended by our fleet , which must also constitute the first line of defence of the islands on which we live . But that fleet ought not to be essential to our safety , for , with the admirable means of conveyance and concentration afforded by our railways , we ought to be certain of being able to meet any army that could be landed with an overwhelming force . Colonel Kennedy tells us the " relative scales of population and commercial activity existing under the protection of the respective flags would justify a British naval force more than fivefold that of France , and threefold that of
Russia , or twice their aggregate amount . The administrative duties of the British Government to its widely-spread pupulation justify a land force equal to twice the aggregate force of France and Russia ; yet the actual amount of British troops of the line is imder one-fifth of the united forces of those two States , and onetenffi of what the comparison with them would justify . " A large proportion of the soldiers of any despotism must be regarded as intended to keep down its own subjects ; but there is a mighty balance left which no one can doubt are kept up with a view to aggressive designs , and we are a long way from possessing an adequate counterpoise . Colonel Kennedy proposes a naval reserve of 60 , 000 men , and the division of the country into districts ( according to a map which he appends ) for the organization of the volunteer land force that we have described . The
militia system involves a large sacrifice of productive industry ; but if Colonel Kennedy be right , -which we think is indisputable , enough military training to render them efticient can be acquired by volunteers during their spare time , and without interfering with their ordinai-y avocations , all that is required being that when the population is thinly scattered smaller bodies shall be required to meet . _ It so happens that our people are very-conveniently located , and that adjacent districts could easily furnish the mea required for their common defence . In London , part of Middlesex , Surrey , and Kent , one-fifth- of the adult males would furnish 118 , 000 menu The south-eastern division , with headquarters at Portsmouth , would , at the same calculation ^ g ive . 81000 men , and so forth . Now it is clear that much smaller
, numbers than these , combined with the regular forces , which the railways could easily transport , would be more than equal to any army likely to be landed upon our shores . With respect to railway conveyance , the Colonel estimates that trains could be despatched from London , or other centre , every quarter of an hour , and that 3 , 000 men could be despatched by each train , which would give 72 , 000 men by one line of rail-Wfly _ jn—twenty-four -. ' hours-. . With this power of concentration and locomotion , we are not surprised to find so good an authority in perfect accord with our often-repeated opinions upon the great fortification job which occupies the declares land is
attention of Government . The Colonel " Eng precisely the country where fortresses would be least applicable . They would lock up our valuable but too scanty troops , who would be required to operate actively in the field against their foe wherever he may present himself , and lamentable indeed will be our case if we ever give an enemy time to sit down before a British fortress . " The fortress scheme is nothing but a painful evidence of mistrust , and those who wish to tax the people to the extent often or twenty millions to build these strongholds , desire to extract from them that enormous sum as a substitute for thqt Yolunteer system which is the only constitutional means of ensuring the safety of a great country where liberty prevails .
June 2, I860.] The Leader And Saturday A...
June 2 , I 860 . ] The Leader and Saturday Analyst . 517
Coal Miners And The Inspection Bill, Pia...
COAL MINERS AND THE INSPECTION BILL , piARLYLB defined political economy as " the arid science . *' V- / The question 1 ms frequently been asked by students not versed in practical life , " Why should political economy , and its laws , OKcito so repulsive and unsatisfactory a feeling among those who receive the teachings of other sciences with satisfaction and delightP" To us the solution of the question is very simple , liie fact is , that the doctrines called scientific , are not truly so , — being either one-aided facts or short-sighted and premature inferences from temporary and passing events . The general and permanent ddctrino Of phenomena , based upon accurate and enlarged , pmlo ? uophio experience , will and must accord with the constitution ot Luman mLturfl . nnd will alwavs commend itself and its philosophy to
all enlightened judgments , and to all sympathetic hearts . We may fairly infer that all doctrines . against which our humane instincts rebel are not true , and , therefore , are not the teachings ot true science . As a case in point , we once more revert to the proposed Mines Inspection Bill , upon which , though . seemingly of little publio importance , there exists the real fundamental differences upon which the economic dqotrinaires and the humanitariansi so strongly disagree . In the early stages of philology , it is the fashion for the time being that constitutes the right ol any meaning
to any word;—and until some Johnson or some Latham comes forward to show the general rule or natural development of law , it will follow in the same way in social science , that the terms are indefinite , and , consequently , much misunderstood . Both philology and political economy , in , their strict natural and scientific principles , are eternally uniform in their laws;—it is man ' s notions and perceptions that vary . In this way we perceive that the men calling' themselves political economists do not strictly deserve that term , and are not acting according to its true principles . It is common among- the class alluded to , to decry and to assert it is not the province of Government to interfere with or to attempt to
regulate arrangements for the interests and operations of capital and labour . It is popular to assert , if these be left to oscillate freely , they will regulate themselves , so as best to advance the whole interests of humanity . Against this opinion the whole testimony of human history invariably witnesses . Where there is no law affecting the relation of interests , society cannot exist . The accidental or naturally strong triumph over and torture the weak until they die out . Without going back into fabulous ages , we will instance the conduct of the Spanish towards the weaker but more 2 virtuous and humane Mexican Indians as a telling" case in . point . We say , therefore , to ignore the influence of law , or to affirm that each in the battle of interests should first look to his
own , not regarding that of others ;—or , in other words , " to buy in the cheapest , and sell in the dearest markets , " is not true economy . And although an advanced school of politicians will tell us selfinterest , when enlightened , will see its true interest , and so will regard the well-being of others in order to advance its own , we reply , all history is against the fact . The very condition of such selfishness being prevalent renders the perception of enlightenment almost impossible , and certainly tends to destroy the very opportunity for such philosophy being proved . The Spanish did not see that killing the Indians , by excessive mining , would be killing the goose which yielded them the gold ; and when tliey either decimatedj the millions , or { so infuriated by oppression as to drive them to madness ' ( for-Indians , like miners , ai-e but still human ) , it was too late to avail themselves of the knowledge such results might have taught . We could enlarge upon the mental blindness and moral obliquity the Spanish practices naturally
involved , and trace how the love of gold and injustice has led—nay , compelled—the Spanish to become the poorest and most wretchedly governed people in Europe . The same game in principle , differing but iu external circumstances , is still playing in the slave states in America , and it is even now ; blighting the vigour and sapping-the strength of the otherwise young on * flourishing republic . JTet all these things were done , and doubtless were well defended by the political economists of the day . Slavery is so defended , and we expect to hear on the 13 tli of June , the day fixed for the third readme of the Mines Inspection Bill , the same old , one-sided , and
therefore unjust and unscientific arguments used . In these arguments self , and the rights of capital and the few , will be advocated against the mass aud the ultimate benefit of all concerned . We have now before us the bill of the Government , the suggestions ot the operative miners for its amendment , and another bill , as proposed by the master miners themselves , for the object , in each case , -oTi-e"gn-lai ^ g-iiienvorkmg-of- « oal- ! niiies ^—T-hat-there-shuuld _ b . o . aQmja general regulations enforced by Government , is now an undisputed condition . We say now undisputed , but it should not be forgotten , mi tlift nrinfiioles of nolitical economy , that the master miners objected
altogether , and opposed inch by inch , the necessity or right of any such regulation . Of course they used the usual arguments , and declared that capital would be driven from the trade , and that both they and the operatives , in consequence , would be ruined : and when the Commission of Inquiry proved beyond doubt that women and children were worked in coal mines in conditions disgrHCelul to humanity , and shocking even to our avtilicial conventionalities , the results of feeling were stigmatised as " maudlin and ' sentimental , " and the supporters of amelioration were nicknamed " humanitarians . " Well , the maudlin sentimentahsm ot the humanitarians prevailed—and we hope it will do so for some tune to to tho coal
come—and the Inspection Bill passed . Strange say , trade is not ruined ; stranger yet , it has from that time IlourwUea in a condition and to a profit unparalleled to the capitalists 1 We said strange , but it is not exactly strango , because the same result followed the operation of the Factories Act , which act , being established in direct opposition to the teachings and prophecies ot the economists , gave wealth instead of ruin to the factory owners . It havine- been proved by experience that the Mines Inspection Bill decidedly advantaged the capitalist—as will all measures advancing the true interests of humanity—it is strange that these very men should still be found ( true to their prejudices ) opposing an extension of the act , found necessary in the workings tor the advancement ot the very object for which it was iirat promoted . The Inspection Act was deemed but an experiment , and was passed as such lor naui
five years . In its renewal , Government have proposed - tional clauses , cluofly "io > make their ftrmeract . work better ; the only really new principle involved is to introduce a clause which may tend to eKsu . e the education of duWwn £ miners so employed . Government lays down , tlmfe -bo J " llS * J eJ JS and twelve year * of age may be employed in a colliery on « ie = r ^ irc ^« aja ^ r ? S 5 S
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), June 2, 1860, page 9, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_02061860/page/9/
-