On this page
-
Text (1)
-
July 1, 1854.] THE LEADER. 60S
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
-
-
Transcript
-
Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software. The text has not been manually corrected and should not be relied on to be an accurate representation of the item.
Additionally, when viewing full transcripts, extracted text may not be in the same order as the original document.
Parliament Of The Week. Lord Aberdeen Is...
but , instead of exacting anything like territorial indemnity , she at once pressed for additional privileges , and if she had obtained those additional privileges for her co-religionists in the Turkish empire , I have 110 doubt that the invasion of the Principalities -would never have taken place , or would immediately have ceased on the Sultan complying with her demands . But of course we felt—Europe felt—that the independence of Turkey would ba as much endangered by the cession of such rights and privileges as were claimed by Russia , as it would have been had she made a positive demand for territorial indemnity ; and therefore it-was that the pretensions of Bussia were resisted . " Mow , my lords , I have been supposed to say also that I desired , or did not object , to a return to the treaty of
Adrianople , because I stated that if we could obtain a peace which sbonld last for twenty-five years we should not do amiss . ( Hear . " ) Nor should we ; but when 1 said that I never foi 5 a moment meant to convey the impression which it seems my words have produced . I never said a word to imply that I desired to return to the treaty of Airianople . What I said , or intended to say , was , that the treaty of Adrianople has given us peace for twentyfive yews , and that it by any treaty which the fortune of ¦ war might enable us to make , we should secure peace for an equal length of time , we should mot , considering the instability of all human afiairs , do so very far amiss . Therefore , niy lords , I am quite at a loss to conceive upon what ground -any one should dare-to say , first , that I have claimed
the honour of making the treaty of Adrianople , and , next , that I approved of or was indifferent to its conditions , and . ¦ was ready to renew it without reference to the present posture of affairs . I have explained to your lordships bow it ca m * that I insisted the other evening upon the limited extent of the ' territorial acquisitions ¦ which Russia has made in consequence of the treaty of Adrianople . My statement upon that point is perfectly true ; it is incontrovertible ; but it was intended to be qualified in the . manner which I have now stated to . your lordships , I feel , therefore , that liave nothing further to say of the treaty of Axlrianople . " It has also been said that I recommended a return to the status quo , or , at least , that I would not object to ir . Now , my lords , this statement surprises me more than anything , because I thought I had taken special care to explain
that point in my answer to the observations of my noble and learned friend . I stated that that might be the cause of some apparently ambiguous expressions -used by Austria and by Prussia , as compared with the expressions used by ourselves , and I said that Austria and Prussia might be desirous to restore the status quo ; but , at the same time , I made the specific declaration , that that was by no means applicable to us—that is , to England and France . You are aware , my lords , that before the declaration of war the status quo was all that we hoped for—all that we desired—all that we attempted to obtain , and that was the condition which the Turkish Government signified its "willingness to agree to . The treaty of Vienna was framed upon the understanding agreed to by all the four powers , that the relations between
. Russia-and lurkey should revert to the status quo . "VVe thought that was quite as much as the Emperor of Russia could expect us to offer , and much more than he hadiany right to expect . But , my lords , we proposed that in the hope that we should be able to preserve the state of peace , and that we should be able to avert our entering upon n course where all the evil passions that war engenders would be lot loose . But the instant that war was declared , the state of the question was entirely altered . ( Loud cheers . ) From that moment everything depended upon the war itself , and we are left free to exercise our own judgment—to do that which we think will best suit our own interests nnd policy in framing the terms of peace . From that moment tho statm quo was entirely at an end . ( Cheers . ) Vcrv
well . 1 also said , as to tho terms of peace , that however desirable , however necessary we might think certain torins to fce , still it would bo unwise in us now , in the present stato of the war , to lay down any conditions of peace as those to whiuh alone wo will accede . These must depend upon tho ovents of the -war ; mid in tho debate to which I have already referred I recollect I did say that tho conditions of peace would be very different if wo found the Russians nt Constantinople from what they would bo if wo found oursolves at St . Petersburg . Well , my lords , within those points lies tho whole scope * of tho variance from tho status quo . Mow far we may deviate from the statm quo no wun can at this moment cay , because that must depend upon events which are not within our power absolutely to control .
But , this wo can say , that t \» c independence and integrity of lurkey aro undoubted cond : tions— -tlioy constitute tho nina qua von— -that must bo secured , and scuurod effectually . ( Ofiears . ) But how this is t <> bo done uiUBt . again depend upon the progross of events , in tho course of tho negotiations wluoh mny tako pluoo at the inomont . But that soourity xnuflt bo taken—socurity for tho indepondonco and integrity oi 1 urkoy , so far as dopenda upon Itusnin , is really tho objeob from wluoh we aro determined not to depart . ( Cheers . ) JJutngjun , I say , how that is to bo obtained neither 1 nor any man in this IIouso is able to say . Wo know what our object is—our main object at least—ami of course l > y one nuxlo another will obtain
or we that without which pvuoo is impossible * *• I think , also , exception has Loon ¦ taken to somo expressio ns of mine , as if 1 oxproHHod doubt or iHaboliuf of any tlanpr - irom Uussmn aggression . Now , 1 wish huro to my , \ ) J ;* ? tho K « lost "lurin as to Kuhhiiih iigi » rosaioii against ! urkoy ltut against that nggroHHioii in any ahapo - ^ whether in tho shape of influence , waothor in tlio shapo ( it conquest ) oriuuiiy otlior modo—wo aro prepared to » rotoot hoi-. But , vllh respect to Uiualun .. ggroamon upon J . uropc , independent of her designs upon Turkey , 1 certainly ( Id express no groat alarm , boouuso I iw \ no m-cnt alarm , i ? i ? " . CUn 0 li toftol !«»>» ( mil loss ovory day . \ lMtuikU , \\ J'L , * »" ' . "i i' ° OuUI l ) 0 H' » PI >«»« 1 lo l » o in poascbHion oi UoiiHt . oitUm plo , if Hh « had made good her nggnmHion upon fi ^ iA - H ( u " : for Eum r- bocii « H « l UihiU i ^ l Xl ? , 4 ' ! Clll , "" ° thel 1 tll () ineinw of Uooining formidable ad aangoranB to ISuropo . Without that , my lords 1 01111-i ) ot protend to say that I ftd any rant lmn . l' il
France to be more powerful than Russia and Amstria put together , and it is , therefore , impossible for' me to look upon Bussia with any great alarm out of her own frontiers , or in such a light as would induce me to think that it would be better to enter at once into a state of war in order to repreSB dangers which I do not feel . Danger from Bussia against Europe appears to me mainl y , if not entirely , to depend upon her power in Turkey and in the Enst . If that power be checked—and it is to be hoped that -we shall succeed in keeping her entirely iree from exciting farther alarm in the Turkish territories—then I cannot possibly think that there need bo any very great alarm as to what she may do
to Austria , or Prussia , or France , or England . ( Cheers . ) This , however much it has been misunderstood , was really all that I meant to express as to my general incredulity of any danger from Russian aggression . I have now shown your lordships what sort of aggression it is that I am afraid of , and w'ha t sort of aggression it is that I am not afraid of . I am not aware that there is any other part of the observations which I addressed to yonr lordships the other night which requires further explanation . I believe I have already explained everything which , from being misunderstood at the time , appeared to be calculated to excite feelings of distrust in the Government .
"My lords , I wish I could confine myself to * his explanation ; to the full expression of the sentiments I entertain , and which appeared to me necessary to be explained . I could have wished certainly that I might have been spared the necessity of saying anything about the extraordinary and absurd imputations—the personal imputations—to which I have been exposed . ( Loud cheers . ') I have no fear that your lordships , who are accustomed to weigh the actions and the sentiments of public men , will fail to comprehend the motives from which I have aoted ; and the misrepresentation of them lias been so ludicrously absurd that I feel—indignant as I am—I feel it would not be worthy-of the position which I now occupy—it would not be worthy of the inemory of those with whom 1 have acted—dt would not be worthy of my own character , if I were to condescend . to enter upon
any justification of my personal motives . ( Loud cheers *) "My lords , It is true that I have more than any other man struggled to preserve the state of peace for this country . I have done so because I thought it my duty to the people of this country—my duty to God and man—to exhaust every possible means of . preserving peace , and my only regret is—though I trust your lordships will acquit me on that point—my only regret is , that I should not have done all , and lest m any way I should have lost some possible means of averting the greatest calamity that can befal a country , for , however glorious any war may be , the calamities which accompany it are heavy enough greatly to outweigh that glory . I know it has been said if you love peace so much , you are unfit for war . My lords , though peace is so dear to my feelings , still I am convinced of "the necessity of this war .
But how do I wish to make -war ? I wish to make -war in order to obtain a peace ; and I know well that the best mode of making war in order speedily to obtain a peace is to make war with the utmost vigour and determination . ( Loud cheers ) . My noble friends near me know well enough that , peaceable as I am , I liave never shrunk—that , on the contrary , I have given my most ready concurrence to the most active measures of host ility find warlike preparations . Nay , more , I believe I may say % ha ^ will admit that I have personally been more urgent than perhaps any other man in exhorting the speed y conpentration and advance of the alliedforces north of the Balkan in support of the gallant army of Qmcr Pacha , and to extend a helping hand to Austria in order to enable her to-carry out her professions . ( Cheers ) . This , except for the warmth of the feelings under which 1 spoke , I ought not , perhaps , to say ;
but it is the truth that , in the course we diavo taken I have invariabl y urged the most decided course of action . ( Loud cheers . ) My lord s , I have now no more'to say . I wish to confine myself to this subject without entering upon other topics more or less connected with the war—with the events that led to it , or that may follow from it—I wish to remove understandings which T feel to be perfectly erroneous interpretations of what I said , and I now declare that so far from my former endeavours to preserve peace disqualifying mo from carrying on the war , I think , though of course 1 may bo wrong in tho particular means , I think wo ought to have reaourso to tho most expedient , tho most prompt , the most successful means of carrying it on . ( Cheers ) . 1 maintain , and assort , that my vury lo \ e of pcaco induces me now to enter upon this war , which I unquestionably believe to bq a perfectly just war , and therefore it is that X—so long as I have anything to do with the Government—shall unquestionably enrry it on in such a manner as will bo most likely to secure benefit to England , and to establish a safe and
honourable peace . " ( Laud and continued cheers . ) Tho Marquis of GLANiuoAnixE . tlescribed the speech of Lord Aberdeen as a " retractation , " and was saluted with cries of " No . " Ho repeated tho descriptive word , and the dissentient 'murmurs were renewed . Then ho went on to make a general onslaught upon the foreign policy of Lord Aberdeen . It was all very well to ^ vritea despatch in December , when the treaty was signed in September , 1829 . What had Lord Aberdeen dono to prevent tho signing of tho treaty ? Why , when tho "disastrous " treaty wna proposed , tlie Minister of Turkoy asked England nnd Franco , anil Austria and Prussia vrhat ho had better do , nnd they said sign . Lord Aberdeen has been " tho most constant , tho most zealous , tho moat powerful , " supporter of arbitrary government . On every possible occasion bo has oppouod tho recognition of reforms in tho qonntiuca with which he had to deal . Was ho not tho
main-Btay ol Dom Miguel ? Did ho not continually find fault with the Quadruple Treaty ? Did ho not stigmatise tho gallant revolution of Belgium as " tho most nenseless and unintelligible recordoil in history ? " Lord Aberdeen did not tho othor night reply to tho luminous speech of Lord I / pndhurst , but to tikut of tho Foreign Secretary . "Vflmt was itH effect abroad ?
" He had a very impartial witness to the effect of that speech—he meant a brief telegraphic report of it which had appeared in a paper whicli iiad probably the greatest circulation t > f any on the coatmenb ~ L'Zndependahce Beige . Mark . the position which we were in . The noble earl had justified a great deal of the delay , languor , tardiness , apparent vascillation , and hesitation ia the whole course of our proceed ings on the ground of his wanting to carry swith him the Governments of the continent , especially of the German Powers . ' Then here was a paper published on the borders of Germany , with an immense circulation over the whole of Germany , and what was the statement hi that paper ? The gentleman who reported for it endeavoured to exercise a very
impartial judgment , and in bis telegraphic despatch , which gave a -veiy few lines of each speech , that of the noble earl was thus reported— ' Earl of Aberdeen a essaye jzisttfier la conduite ate la Rtissie et apluide la cause de la paix . ' That was the view of the speech which he ventured to say-was entertained over the wnole of the continent ; and he asked , was it a matter of -no importance that those © pinions should go forth , even though the noble earl was not supported in them by his colleagues ? He thought , for a-sbort summary , that that gave fairly the tenourof the noble earl ' s speech , for he thought tha . t the noble earl had justified the Emperor in some acts which he had adopted , and had pleaded very strongly in favour of peace . "
Lord Clanricarde attacked , the Government for the delay in the preparations for war , and imputed it to Lord Aberdeen ; he criticised the appointment of the Duke of Newcastle as War Minister , and declared in favour of Lord Palmerston . Making a ; general attack on the Government , he lemaxked topon ihe number , 330 , with wfeach they came into power , ithe great increase , 400 , during last session , and the striking fact that this "session they cannot carry their measures . " Was cfhe reason For this state of things that there -rcas any want of ability in the ^ members of the GovernmeDt ivhosat in the other House ! He need hardly say anything with regard to the reputation , the ability , and character of Lord John Russell , a statesman respected by all men , followed by many , than whom no one possessed greater practical Parliamentary experience . Was he unaided upon the bench on
which he sat ? He had upon the one side Lord Palmerston , indisputably the most popular man with" the country in either House of Parliament , and on the other side Mr . Gladstone , a most accomplished debater , undoubtedly the most acute logician in either House , whose pywer of reasoning was almost capable of proving that black was white . T-he Government consisted of a combination of men eminent for administrative capacity , who were at the head of a great party , and [ who , besides that party , were supported by a great number of other , although perhaps less attached friends . How came it , then , that they were in the predicament he had described , for no one could deny that they had been defeated day after day , and obliged to withdraw measures they had proposed , so that , practically , the servants of the Crown could not carry on the business which they thought it desirable to carry on ? He attributed it to the First Lord of the Treasury . " ( Cheers and lauohier . )
Neither the Parliament nor the country has any confidence in Lord Aberdeen ; and Lord Clanricarde , were it not -for the humble position he occupies , would propose a vote of want of confidence ! Lord Beaumont admired the moralcourage with which Lord Aberdeen had put himself in what some would call a humiliating position , in ' order that he might explain a speech . Certainly it had removed some Buspicions , but was not quite satisfactory . Lord Beaumont then inquired whether a paragraph published in the Press—a journal representing Lord Derby in the press— "was accurate .
" His Highness Prince Metternich , at the special and personal request of his Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Austria , has embodied in n . State paper his view of the arrangements which , in tho presont condition of affairs , may conduce to ' a just and ¦ honourable peace . ' We have reason to believe that those viowshavo boon communicated , although , not officially , to the Eurl of Aberdeen ; and that little doubt prevails , from previous communications that have token place , that they will bo substantially adoptod by tho English Minister . " Lord Aberdeen ' s reply was characteristic . " Tho noble lord has addressed a question to mo whiuh I am perfectly ready to answer , and I hopo-to > bc able to unawer , satisfactorily . I observed the paragraph in tho pnpor which ho has quoted , and I admired its ingenuity , because , my former acquaintance nn < l friendship with Prince Mottenucu
having been known , it was a very good notion to throw out tho idea that 1 was engaged in negotiations with him in the senso"vrhioh wns endeavoured to bo implied by tho writer oi that nrbiclo . Thorcfoio I thought it very ingenious . But I can only say this : that what the Einporor of Austria may have dono in consulting sin old and valued eowitnt , and X hopo hii -may have consulted him . but whether lie hn » or not , I um pprfuctly ignorant . My noblo and learned Xriand mentioned Prinoo Mottoniioli tho other night with praiao , ami I took up tho aumo strain . I lmvo soon it roportod in somo nnpor , that the Emperor was about to tuko tho advice of Prince Mettornich , and tlint ho has dono so tho paragraph alluded to is 1 hopein Hint part , correct . Whether it bo so
, , or not I ennnot say . All t know is , as far us T am concerned , there is jaat thotminoarnonntof truth in it as in all the other imputiuiuiiH against mo , which I Imve tho happiness of scoing day alter day—namely , mot u mnglo Hvllablo . ( Ckeern . ~ ) It bo happoiiN that b » mc ( i 1 lmvo boon In aflloo , intimute uva I foriHurly wua with 1 ' riiKo Motbernich , neither directly nor indiioctly lmvo 1 had «> iy ooiumuuioution with him far tho last your and a half until a low days 4 » go , when a ludy frlond of muio told mo hIio was writing to Prmce Mottornich , and I said , ' Pmy niako my bent roinombntncoa to him . '" ( CZiccra and lauff / itcr . ) Lord Urououam declared tlmtLord Aberdeen had
July 1, 1854.] The Leader. 60s
July 1 , 1854 . ] THE LEADER . 60 S
-
-
Citation
-
Leader (1850-1860), July 1, 1854, page 3, in the Nineteenth-Century Serials Edition (2008; 2018) ncse-os.kdl.kcl.ac.uk/periodicals/l/issues/cld_01071854/page/3/
-